News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Evaluation of five password managers by SloopJon on Friday December 21, 2018 @02:55PM (#18736065)
That page says, "Requires Google Chrome or Firefox," and the download link takes you to the Chrome web store. I'm not sure the poster considers that full support.
Re:Evaluation of five password managers by mithr on Friday December 21, 2018 @05:23PM (#18737231)
That's somewhat fair, although the 1Password X page (which is what AgileBits calls their in-browser version) describes it as being comparable to the native versions, which to me goes against OP's statement that

> full functionality can’t be dependent on an app which is only available on Mac OS and/or Windows.

The existence of 1Password X means that full functionality is not _dependent_ on a MacOS/Windows app. The argument that there should be a graphical (because there _is_ a multi-platform CLI), native app for Linux, which does not depend on any browser, is a perfectly valid one -- but it is also an argument that I don't believe they've made.

Re:Evaluation of five password managers by loeg on Friday December 21, 2018 @06:14PM (#18737581)
1Password X is definitely not comparable to the native versions, and the statement was "full functionality can’t be dependent on an app which is only available on Mac OS and/or Windows."

> The argument that there should be a graphical (because there _is_ a multi-platform CLI), native app for Linux, which does not depend on any browser, is a perfectly valid one -- but it is also an argument that I don't believe they've made.

I think they're making that argument.

Re:Evaluation of five password managers by hnra on Saturday December 22, 2018 @03:33AM (#18739639)
I have no experience with the mac app but 1Password X is certainly better than the native windows app.
Re:Evaluation of five password managers by jik on Saturday December 22, 2018 @11:28AM (#18741193)
There is substantial functionality which is only available in the native app, not in 1Password X, and therefore completely unavailable on Linux.

If the 1Password X claims that its functionality is comparable to the native version, then it is lying.

Re:Evaluation of five password managers by bsamuels on Friday December 21, 2018 @03:15PM (#18736228)
How many Linux users don't have chrome or firefox installed?

I think the article would be a bit more accurate to say there's not native client support for Linux.

Re:Evaluation of five password managers by avhon1 on Friday December 21, 2018 @03:23PM (#18736296)
There are applications besides web browsers that require passwords. For example, password-protected documents, or encrypted archives. A password managers that requires, or only supports, web browsers is incomplete.
Re:Evaluation of five password managers by eridius on Friday December 21, 2018 @09:29PM (#18738536)
A password manager that is only usable in a web browser may be annoying to use for non-web-related tasks, but presumably you can just switch to your web browser, open up the password manager, and then search for what you need within it. It's not like the password manager is restricted to only giving you access to the passwords for the current site.
Re:Evaluation of five password managers by loeg on Friday December 21, 2018 @06:19PM (#18737613)
Regardless, 1password X does not provide the full functionality of the native apps, so it's fair to say a Mac or Windows app is required for full functionality anyway.
Re:Evaluation of five password managers by freehunter on Friday December 21, 2018 @05:24PM (#18737239)
None of my headless servers have Chrome or Firefox installed.
Re:Evaluation of five password managers by hnra on Saturday December 22, 2018 @03:35AM (#18739646)
They offer a CLI for this case.
Re:Evaluation of five password managers by sano1 on Friday December 21, 2018 @05:26PM (#18737256)
How is this different than just trusting the browser to handle saved passwords in an encrypted manner?