Re:I Do Not Like Go
by hollerith on Friday December 21, 2018 @09:28AM
(#18733468)
I will assume you're referring to Node. The browser explains why many coders know Javascript well; the fact that many coders know Javascript well explains the popularity of Node --without our having to resort to the hypothesis that Javascript is a good language.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I Do Not Like Go
by YeGoblynQueenne on Friday December 21, 2018 @06:30PM
(#18737660)
I'm referring to the adoption of javascript as the scripting language for browsers. Why else do "many coders know javascript well"?
The story of how we got Javascript in browsers has absolutely nothing to do with "adoption".
Re:I Do Not Like Go
by YeGoblynQueenne on Saturday December 22, 2018 @05:06AM
(#18739936)
But there wasn't anything stopping early browsers from using a different scripting language. They stuck with javascript. Was that because it was a good language?
And what about Java, for example? And why don't people "flock" to LISP, say, or Haskell? Are those "bad" languages, now? And what about software, like windows- is windows widely used because it's a great operating system?
Adoption is a rotten bad measure of quality. Not just in programming languages- in everything.
> But there wasn't anything stopping early browsers from using a different scripting language.
You mean "nothing stopping the other browser, Microsoft Internet Explorer, from adopting Netscape's Javascript too".
Re:I Do Not Like Go
by YeGoblynQueenne on Sunday December 23, 2018 @10:12AM
(#18746471)
Well yes. Don't the other browser vendors count as adopters?