Re:Anatomy of the Digg Crisis
by far33d on Wednesday May 02, 2007 @12:07PM
(#18736)
Screwed if they ban (community leaves, crisis, etc). Screwed if they don't (DMCA). They made the right choice: It's better to be taken down by the MPAA than to take yourself down by antagonizing your users.
Re:Anatomy of the Digg Crisis
by usablecontent on Wednesday May 02, 2007 @12:16PM
(#18741)
Totally agreed, I think Kevin Rose made the right choice. Banning the stories at this juncture would have been a suicide.
The users threatened to move on to Reddit, but this does not mean Reddit would have been a beneficiary, it would have to either allow this or show the users door once again.
Re:Anatomy of the Digg Crisis
by byrneseyeview on Wednesday May 02, 2007 @12:42PM
(#18751)
So far, mainstream coverage has been sparse. Forbes has an article, and some of the British papers do, but the Washington Post and NYT don't have stories. If I had to guess, I'd say that this is huge news to people who know what Digg is, and that it won't attract the attention of anyone else.
The users threatened to move on to Reddit, but this does not mean Reddit would have been a beneficiary, it would have to either allow this or show the users door once again.
cant help imagining how much press coverage Digg has got on this issue