You're saying that having two successful products is only good when they have equal sales figures?
I don't know of a single company on the planet that would turn its nose up at a product doing $25 BILLION in sales.
[citation needed]
> Haven't the latest Macbooks suffered from significant feature regressions?
No.
Unreliable keyboards and security chips that frequently crash the computer are feature regressions.
And there is no systemic issues with the security chips. We have entire floors of developers using MacBook Pros and no one has had “frequent crashes” from the T2 chip.
So no, both were significant improvements from my perspective.
Well, let me rephrase that: sure, I get that dongles are annoying, and there are capital-I Issues with USB-C that need to be worked out. But the alternative to dongles is "never change hardware connectors." Unless you make the leap to USB-C by replacing every single peripheral and cable you own, you will probably need an adapter. And you may say that now is not the right time, and you might be right, but again: unless the entire market shifts virtually overnight, there is going to be a period where using a new connector is annoying, and is going to require dongles.
tl;dr: I'm happy to be a homesteader in Dongletown, baby.
How? The improvements to the iPhone are less compelling every year, while the prices are going up. The company recently stopped reporting iPhone sales numbers.
> Apple is a 40 year old company, and they're still raking in the dough from their original product category.
Are they, though? Aren't Mac sales insignificant compared to iPhone sales? Haven't the latest Macbooks suffered from significant feature regressions?