Missing a final could easily be a life-altering event, so I don't think it really makes sense in this case.

As long as it's a rare occurrence, I don't really see the problem here.

Punishment has never been an efficient way of changing behavior.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/feeling-our-way/2014...

Nobody wants to avoid the behavior when punishment is introduced, they want to avoid the punishment itself. Typically speaking, this is done by circumventing the punishment, rather than correcting the behavior. Besides, (almost) nobody purposely sleeps through their final - especially not if they take the time to ask someone to be a backup alarm. You'd be advocating for punishment of an accident at that point, which is aggressively useless at best, and sadistic at worst.

I'm pretty sure the consensus is that positive reinforcement, when used consistently and over a long time, can be used without any negative reinforcement and still get the requisite training results. That's leaving aside the fact that negative reinforcement is bad for the relationship with your child and/or pet.

Completely on this subject though, I find the behaviour in question here insane. Mostly because adults are supposed to be independent and competent. Of course, not everyone is raised equally. If this works for them, who are we to judge?

That's a really inefficient way to train good behavior.

The alternative is every one gets a gold star for waking up on time.

Lol, no. This is not a dichotomy.

That's why you learn stuff like this before you're in friggin college.

The offspring wakes up at the time determined or else the offspring gets the hose again.