News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by kawfey on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @11:57AM (#18708121)
I learned from Nextdoor, that a neighbor of mine put cat litter in an amazon box, and later found out her car's driver side window busted in and the litter dumped on the seat. I now just have packages sent to lockers and UPS/FedEX access points, and I know a few who have packages delivered to their office.

The crappy part is that she captured clear detail of both events but police couldn't be bothered. Nest and Ring have been doing their part to fight back, allowing people to publicly post and set up neighborhood watches against porch pirates et al, but there's still a ways to go before security camera footage can be sent to the PD and automatically identify the offender via facial analysis.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by DickingAround on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @12:21PM (#18708381)
That is a real shame. If the police are not going to mediate property disputes between people, they take a lot of risk those disputes will escalate into violence. Perhaps really-good passive defense is enough (e.g. package lock boxes) but I also hope the police understand the deeper reasoning around their position and role.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by netsharc on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @12:36PM (#18708557)
Having lived in a "3rd world" country, I know the police there is useless, but it's interesting how things like resource issues (not enough manpower) is slowly turning living standards of rich countries like the US and UK towards "3rd world" levels.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by rootusrootus on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @12:49PM (#18708686)
In some areas perhaps. In my neighborhood the police respond to any property crime, and pretty fast at that. But ... maybe we are just boring.

Perhaps there are some areas in the US where this is a problem, but I don't know if it's safe to generalize that the US is degrading to third-world status just yet.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by raverbashing on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:12PM (#18708927)
Well given the police in the US works at city level, if you are in a suburb that's not "the capital city" your police might be bored enough to go for every call, things like "suspicious person walking on street"
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by iamdave on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:57PM (#18709408)
"suspicious person walking on street"

My dad used to say "there's few things more dangerous in the suburbs than a bored cop".

Been involved in some of those interactions while walking home in my own neighborhood. They're not pleasant. One involved handcuffs and a 30 minute sit on the curb while my backpack was searched. Yes I'm referring to these past incidents in plural for a reason. No, the complaints to the city and precinct didn't do anything.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by rootusrootus on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:58PM (#18709434)
Ha, that's probably true. Though the last time I was walking down the street when a city cop rolled past, he waved. I waved.

I have lived some places where the police culture was more toxic, definitely.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by iamdave on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:05PM (#18709498)
It's definitely a YMMV kind of thing.

I'm not going to go on some kind of "all cops are bastards" bend here, cause that's not the case and this isn't the forum for it, but I've had more bad experiences with the police than good ones.

None of them resulted in an arrest or charges filed (this is excluding moving violations because death, taxes and speeding tickets; I was a 23 year old driving a Mustang lol) since none of the interactions involved me doing anything illegal. After a few experiences like that you learn to keep an eye on a police officer when you see one, but there's no urge to make your presence overtly known to them either.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by swebs on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @03:59PM (#18710506)
Conversely, I grew up in a pretty rough area of Philadelphia and had nothing but good experiences with police. They're usually pretty cool and active in the community. If you're not selling crack or in the middle of stabbing some guy, you're already better than 99% of the people they have to deal with on a daily basis.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by omegaham on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @06:52PM (#18711728)
Yep. I live in Hillsboro, a pretty quiet suburb of Portland. Police here are so bored that when a bunch of drunk teenagers were acting a fool on our street, they sent three cop cars to grab the kiddos and drive them back to their parents' houses.

Head over to Portland, and the cops are so overloaded with dealing with more serious crimes that they won't even respond to auto theft.

I would definitely call the police for package theft in my town, and I'd have a good expectation that they'd assign an officer to watch for crime patterns and get the guys.

In Portland, I'd be duplicating this guy's glitter bomb.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by crankylinuxuser on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:31PM (#18709141)
What kind of neighborhood do you live in? What's the average house price there? What's the racial demographic look like?
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by learc83 on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:05PM (#18708853)
Itst not really a lack of manpower. It's that most of the time, evidence is grainy security camera footage. What are they going to do with that?
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by jiveturkey on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @04:33PM (#18710798)
there's enough manpower. there isn't enough budget.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by Jyaif on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @12:48PM (#18708682)
Robbers and burglers basically have immunity now because the police is busy with... I'm not sure what.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by roseburg on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:01PM (#18708810)
Most departments are understaffed. Turns out all the negative press against police is having long term impacts on how many kids want to grow up and become a police officer.

Also property crimes always take a backseat to more violent crimes.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by chrisdhoover on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:18PM (#18708999)
In many cases the police and sheriffs themselves are not hiring because they are faced with choice of keeping high pension payouts or hiring more people
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by omegaham on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @06:54PM (#18711740)
Also, the background check process is intense, (and deals with the exact same understaffing problems) and it turns out that most people aren't willing to wait for nine months to get vetted for an entry-level job.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by kristofferR on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @08:41PM (#18712342)
It's insane that police officer is an entry level job, no wonder you have so many issues with the police in the US.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by netsharc on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @03:48AM (#18714198)
Not sure if you're blaming the press for doing their jobs...
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by dragonwriter on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:55PM (#18709941)
> Robbers and burglers basically have immunity now because the police is busy with... I'm not sure what.

Robbers and burglars usually get attention.

Petty theft that does not involve robbery or burglary doesn't, but there is a world of difference between the three crimes.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by 0xfeba on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:54PM (#18709922)
Depends wildly on the area, but property crimes rarely go about a 20% clear rate. That is, 80% of the time criminals get away with it.

Some areas even murder is 60%.

A healthy society keeps people from committing crimes, not a giant police force.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by reaperducer on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:18PM (#18709640)
If the police are not going to mediate property disputes between people, they take a lot of risk those disputes will escalate into violence.

They're too busy training on their new hand-me-down military gear. Local cops need tanks to keep you safe, citizen.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by cwkoss on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @03:50PM (#18710415)
Police inaction is the main reason that I can't get behind political calls to ban guns: cops are not required to protect or defend you.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by dragonwriter on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @04:14PM (#18710633)
> If the police are not going to mediate property disputes between people

The police exist to maintain order on behalf of the State, the civil justice system exists to mediate property disputes between people. There is sometimes some synergy between the functions, but they are very different.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by SheinhardtWigCo on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:44PM (#18709288)
> there's still a ways to go before security camera footage can be sent to the PD and automatically identify the offender via facial analysis.

Be careful what you wish for. I don't want the police to be able to perform accurate facial recognition at the kind of scale you're talking about, even if that would make it harder for thieves to steal packages.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by cronix on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:20PM (#18709655)
> I don't want the police to be able to perform accurate facial recognition at the kind of scale you're talking about

Amazon is helping cities and counties implement Rekognition systems fairly cheap with cameras tied to criminal databases. It's happening. They've done it in Washington County, OR, Orlando, FL, and others [1]. Amazon is also teaming up with law enforcement to install Ring doorbells with cameras (Amazon owns them) hooked up to the same type of system.[2] Palantir Systems (CIA backed) have done similar in NYC[3] and even doing PREDICTIVE crime analysis in New Orleans[4] and Chicago [5]. In the case of New Orleans, the public and city counsel was not even made aware. Only the mayor knew. Yes, be very, very careful what you wish for.

[1] https://aws.amazon.com/rekognition/customers/

[2] https://qz.com/1495241/amazon-has-a-clever-way-to-catch-pack...

[3] https://gizmodo.com/how-palantir-is-taking-over-new-york-cit...

[4] https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/27/17054740/palantir-predict...

[5] https://www.theverge.com/2016/8/19/12552384/chicago-heat-lis...

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by irrational on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @06:24PM (#18711548)
This is weird. I live in Washington County Oregon. There are stories everyday on nextdoor.com from neighbors trying to get the Sheriff's office to look at their surveillance video of crimes being committed, but the police aren't interested. They usually post the video clips on nextdoor and these aren't grainy videos but super clear recordings that should make it easy to identify the perpetrators if they really are using the Amazon system.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by dragonwriter on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @06:37PM (#18711623)
A surveillance panopticon isn't going to make package theft any more of a priority than it is now; the issue isn't an evidence one but a priorities one, and more evidence doesn't change this.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by apricot on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:59PM (#18709437)
What we want is immaterial in this case. The police will be able to do just that, very soon.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by baldfat on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:35PM (#18709196)
Have your neighbor contact her State Representative or State Senator. Police know their budgets will get screwed if they piss off these people.

Twice I have emailed the police and CC the Mayor of my city. I got a sorry can we meet in person response in an hour. The Sargent on Call was eating humble pie when he was called in and got chewed out by the Mayor and the Police. (Story a neighbor I don't know was physically assaulted by his girlfriend and she ripped his shirt and scratched him up. I stopped him from destroying her and going to jail. I called the police and no one came. We walked over to the station with 3 police cars sitting outside and were turned away.)

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by kawfey on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @03:03PM (#18710027)
I forgot to mention this is in the city of St Louis. They all know they've got far bigger fish to fry.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by efreak on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @04:42PM (#18710847)
If you're having stuff delivered by USPS, you can also use General Delivery service [0][1] to have items held for you at the post office. It doesn't seem like something that should be used too frequently, though, and not all post offices will do it, and some might charge for it. [1][2]

[0]: https://pe.usps.com/text/pub28/28c2_033.htm [1]: https://www.techjunkie.com/how-to-use-usps-general-delivery-... [2]: https://pe.usps.com/text/dmm300/508.htm#ep1052038

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by beached_whale on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:21PM (#18709028)
I wonder if this would make a good startup. Allow people to share footage of thieves stealing goods. Allow varying levels of geolocation and let people suggest identities. Not sure what other precautions would be needed to protect from misidentification.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:01PM (#18709474)
> let people suggest identities

Have we learned nothing from Reddit circa 2013?

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by drharby on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @11:19PM (#18712973)
"We did it, reddit!"
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by cwkoss on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:46PM (#18709304)
How does it make money?
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by WrtCdEvrydy on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:09PM (#18709552)
You can pay to remove videos of you off the platform, revenge porn site style.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by cwkoss on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:20PM (#18709660)
Ooh, this is clever.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by technofiend on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:07PM (#18709514)
Rental fees from people who want to put out exactly these kind of packages to deter theft. You'd need a high deposit to cover loss of the device. On the other hand mass-producing it would certainly allow both economy of scale and substituting lower cost parts than (for example) an off-the-shelf cellphone for video capture and streaming.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by Pxtl on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @05:33PM (#18711222)
Offer cash rewards.

The system takes a cut.

Crowd-sourced bounty-hunting.

Of course, once it becomes a cash transaction you're dealing with dispute resolution. "I said it was Fred" "It wasn't Fred" "Yes it was! Pay me!".

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by dwighttk on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:52PM (#18709905)
>but there's still a ways to go before security camera footage can be sent to the PD and automatically identify the offender via facial analysis.

Good.

I'm against theft, and also against Police and facial analysis mixing.

[dead]
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by TimTheTinker on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @12:54PM (#18708736)
> ubiquitous accurate facial recognition

You mean like the system in China? No thanks. Never underestimate the propensity of any government to violate human rights when given the power to do so.

If a choice has to be made between the two, a government that respects human rights is far preferable to a country without crime among citizens.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by scarejunba on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @12:59PM (#18708778)
Yeah, dude. It would be awesome. I could instantly know if you’re a douche or a nice person, refuse service to you because you parked across a handicapped spot for no reason, or just choose to have conversations with the best people and ignore all the boring dudes.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by EForEndeavour on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @12:48PM (#18708676)
Better yet, we could wall in the criminals and declare the inside of their "cells" to be the outside, thus walling them out.
[dead]
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by deadmetheny on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:11PM (#18708908)
Yes, that shining paragon of virtue that is well-loved by everybody, the HOA.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by scarejunba on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:18PM (#18708991)
Haha, Revealed Preferences show that people don’t abhor them as much as they say. They choose to live there for all the lovely things they provide and enforce.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by deadmetheny on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @03:49PM (#18710396)
Do they choose to live within HOA neighborhoods, or do they have little choice given that over half of the residential homes in the USA are bound by one? I would like to see if your source claims people like the HOA or if they are forced to tolerate them due to lack of options.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by MrMorden on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @04:43PM (#18710862)
Developers in the US have no choice; the city/county won't permit a subdivision without an HOA.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by dragonwriter on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @05:44PM (#18711309)
Developers love HOAs, they initially (until the development is largely sold) completely control them and they are a tool for maintaining the image they want to sell later units. No one is forcing developers to have HOAs. (If there is policy favoring them, it was lobbied for by developers.)
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by bena on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @07:21PM (#18711895)
It also allows them to reclaim and resell units while swindling the people who bought the lot.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by dvtrn on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:44PM (#18709825)
What I’m proposing is simply that we privatize large parts of society and exclude people from the private areas based on their tendency to be bad actors.

Have these people been convicted of crimes?

Because if they haven't, then yes, actually you are absolutely advocating restricting freedoms, and stumbling dangerously close to advocating redlining which has been illegal in the US for decades.

Edit:

Pardon my double post, I think a page got stuck loading on me somewhere.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by scarejunba on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @12:23AM (#18713250)
No more than you're curtailing my freedom by not letting me into your home. I've been convicted of nothing but you won't just let me into your home.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by dvtrn on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @12:44PM (#18717556)
An individual private citizen not letting you onto their property is categorically different from the state passing laws dictating where individuals who aren't prisoners, captives or wards of the state may travel, commune, and reside--and it's an astonishing notion that anyone would try to conflate one with the other and expect to be taken seriously when they say it's "not about curtailing freedom".
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by scarejunba on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @06:32PM (#18721018)
Ah, but I wasn't requiring the state to pass laws. Only for the state to allow for private enterprise to build safe places using this trust factor.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by dvtrn on Thursday December 20, 2018 @11:08AM (#18726079)
Ah, but I wasn't requiring the state to pass laws

A word of advice then: best state that immediately from the very beginning next time, instead of equivocating your way around the point for days. The minute you start talking about "curtailing freedom" there is one inextricable link that conjures in the mind from this type of language: the state.

Backing off it once the horse has been beaten into putty to say "oh I wasn't talking about the state" just looks like you're doing all of this for sport and not attempting to hold an actual meaningful position before finding a convenient escape hatch out of the discussion.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by btilly on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:59PM (#18709976)
I am trying to understand the mentality of someone who can say Like a massive HOA while thinking that this is a good thing.

Have you never dealt with an HOA in your life? Have you never known someone who has?

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by scarejunba on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @12:29AM (#18713286)
I mean, like half of all Americans choose to live in HOA covered areas. They love to hate them. They don't actually hate them.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by aaron-santos on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:36PM (#18709198)
Expect this to be immediately co-opted by political camps to exacerbate and codify divisions that exist today.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by scarejunba on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:14PM (#18709610)
Is that so bad? We can protect human freedom through the US constitution.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by dsfyu404ed on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @04:28PM (#18710758)
The 2nd-6th amendment have not exactly been effective at protecting the human rights they affirm at the state and city level. Where I live I have to get permission from the government (good luck if you're not white) to own the tools to defend myself from physical harm and the government can stop me and seize my property on a whim.

I believe we need more defense in depth. We need our human rights to be protected by every level of government and informally by society itself.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by snazz on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:08PM (#18708890)
I think “denying food, shelter, and water” counts as curtailing people’s freedom.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by Frondo on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @02:20PM (#18709656)
You are absolutely proposing restricting freedom, just that you want to be the one defining how to do so, i.e. you want to be in charge.

It is a story as old as time.

Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by scarejunba on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @12:25AM (#18713263)
Would you let me into your house? How is this any different?
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by irrational on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @06:27PM (#18711565)
Ooh! And we could expand it! What if it could identify for us who is republican or democrat, who is jewish or catholic, who is some other demographic? That would be terrific, wouldn't it?
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by scarejunba on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @12:25AM (#18713259)
I mean, sure, right? It's like living in a big mansion with your friends and choosing who gets to visit. I think that's perfectly okay. If you want to restrict me out I'm okay with that.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves by bovermyer on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:01PM (#18708802)
Escape From New York?