Re:Neural Networks as Ordinary Differential Equations
by itin on Monday December 17, 2018 @05:53PM
(#18703012)
specifically, I don't see where the last step G(h_t) = etc. follows from
Re:Neural Networks as Ordinary Differential Equations
by rkevingibson on Monday December 17, 2018 @05:55PM
(#18703024)
Yup, that's a mistake. Shouldn't have the +h term at the end.
Re:Neural Networks as Ordinary Differential Equations
by jeromebaek on Monday December 17, 2018 @06:27PM
(#18703252)
Stared at this for a while also. Yes this is wrong.
Re:Neural Networks as Ordinary Differential Equations
by _fullpint on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @12:21AM
(#18704700)
Thank you for bringing this up. Legit, was bothering me to the extent I didn’t believe I could comprehend the article.
Re:Neural Networks as Ordinary Differential Equations
by vanderZwan on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @06:30AM
(#18705815)
So what is the correct equation? Or has the article already been fixed?
Re:Neural Networks as Ordinary Differential Equations
by mlevental on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @11:00AM
(#18707500)
the mistake is simply that G(h(t)) = F(h(t))/dt, rather than G(h(t)) = F(h(t))/dt + h(t), i.e. it's only in the text following the inset equations. you can verify this by looking at the "Evaluating ODEs" section.
edit: looks to have been fixed now.
https://imgur.com/a/QXUZerV