Re:Serverless Computing: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back
by DATACOMMANDER on Sunday December 16, 2018 @05:47AM
(#18692556)
I think it’s a play on the word serverless and their argument that serverless is a lot less performant than “serverful” in the general use case.
“Less is more” ==> “serverless is more” ==> “But serverless is too much less performant” ==> “Too much ‘less’” ==> “Too less”
...or something like that? I wouldn’t worry about it. I’m a native English speaker and I also thought it was awkward, though I (think I) know what they were going for.
“Less is more” ==> “serverless is more” ==> “But serverless is too much less performant” ==> “Too much ‘less’” ==> “Too less”
...or something like that? I wouldn’t worry about it. I’m a native English speaker and I also thought it was awkward, though I (think I) know what they were going for.