I suppose we cant expect Amazon workers to go into excel and calculate their yearly earnings from prizes?
If they did this, its a non issue.
But I suppose we can't expect Amazon workers to do this... correct?
>The whole system reeks of commoditization of labor
You say this like its a bad thing. If you can turn labor into something an unskilled/uneducated worker can do, humanity is more productive. This is the goal of creating processes.
It's dehumanizing, and petty to try and squeeze people out this way.
I wasnt going to make a career out of a job that gave me a free shirt for working extra hard.
But then again, I'm an engineer, so maybe I make better decisions.
Seems unlikely. Engineers are as prone to bad decision making as anyone else. Some of them - the supercilious dickheads who believe their own hype - even more so.
Secondly, it is not a reward for working efficiently, it is a reward for working the most efficiently. There is only one winner and the other participants get nothing. The company gets the added value either way of course. This is a great if you want to break up employee solidarity too.
Thirdly, the term 'efficiency' implies there is some sort of process optimization going on; the same energy goes in, more value comes out. I doubt workers are suddenly provided with better tooling during 'power hour', so 'efficiency' probably just means 'run faster, exhaust yourself'.
Finally, you can bet 'power hour' metrics are used to adjust regular productivity targets related to other 'incentives', overall making the jobs more demanding and less rewarding over time.
The whole system reeks of commoditization of labor, treating workers as mere goods that can be bought and systematically manipulated, and thinking about living, feeling humans in this way is disgusting to me.