Re:Firefox 64 Released
by orf on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @02:17PM
(#18657951)
Then perhaps you can see why telemetry is useful to responsible companies like Firefox, and maybe people who disable it have no right to complain about decisions based off telemetry data?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
This is a fascinatingly coercive take on the privacy / observability tradeoff.
Re:Firefox 64 Released
by kiriakasis on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @02:56PM
(#18658319)
No, this is supporting direct feedback. How can mozzila know which features are useful in your opinion? how should they know that you wanted [feature X]?
Maybe they are also in the wrong if the telemetry is excessive, but the alternative is to never deprecate any feature ever.
Re:Firefox 64 Released
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @04:31PM
(#18659109)
They could ask.
Ask who? Power users? Then the only signal they would get is "every feature is used by everyone". That's worthless 'data'. Telemetry is the only way mozilla could possibly collect real data.
Re:Firefox 64 Released
by CamperBob2 on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @08:13PM
(#18660554)
And receive answers like, "A faster horse."
Re:Firefox 64 Released
by NeedMoreTea on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @09:51PM
(#18661006)
They could ask slightly more focused questions than "what would you like?".
Better than keep removing features and reasons to use Firefox from some of their loyalest users, even if they are a minority. User retention seems Mozilla's largest issue at the moment now they're down under 10%.
Re:Firefox 64 Released
by pseudalopex on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @09:12PM
(#18660823)
Telemetry can tell you which features someone uses. It doesn't tell you why.
Re:Firefox 64 Released
by Nullabillity on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @03:26PM
(#18658555)
Then perhaps you can see why using telemetry is irresponsible.