"Yourself"?

I am quite sure you are not aware of the issue here. We're talking about binding, or forced arbitration. Often times, people are unaware that they are being forced into arbitration, and when they are, it severely limits their legal recourse. There's little reason to support it, unless you're a huge company with liability concerns.

Here's a good source on the matter:

https://www.consumeradvocates.org/for-consumers/arbitration

Then don't force it. If it truly is best for both parties, both parties will opt for it. It doesn't need to be required.

If you don't want to have your "dirty laundry aired out in public courts", then don't have dirty laundry.

No one tries to have dirty laundry, and if you are a company of any significant size there’s going to be dirty laundry regardless.

I don't accept this statement. If employees attempting to seek redress over HR issues would hurt the image of a company than that company has some really toxic stuff going on.

If only us men stopped using women like objects at such a rate that it bears statistically significant stress on the scale of the industry! Then most businesses would need to spend zero time and money.

I am not sure what you are implkying here but most (95%+) men do not use women like object in western countries.