Re:Coinbase is exploring the addition of new currencies
by jf- on Sunday December 09, 2018 @09:07PM
(#18644663)
Artworks, antiques, gemstones. None of these are of any practical value, yet they hold value. You’re over systematising and not getting it. Value isn’t inherently rational.
Also, what was the false equivalence?
Re:Coinbase is exploring the addition of new currencies
by tptacek on Sunday December 09, 2018 @09:25PM
(#18644747)
Try this: being a store of value is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for Bitcoin's viability.
Re:Coinbase is exploring the addition of new currencies
by jf- on Sunday December 09, 2018 @09:40PM
(#18644801)
Try this: why?
Re:Coinbase is exploring the addition of new currencies
by tptacek on Sunday December 09, 2018 @10:18PM
(#18644911)
Because otherwise your claim for Bitcoin's ability to store value is circular. Bitcoin has value because it's supposedly a viable tool for commerce. But it's not currently useful as a medium of exchange, and it competes with systems that are far better than it.
The "store of value" argument doesn't mean anything. Beanie Babies, tulip bulbs, and Hummel Figurines are also "stores of value".