Re:After 48 hours we haven't seen any sign people are using ...
by dragonwriter on Saturday December 08, 2018 @08:08PM
(#18638585)
The US, even cities with “pretty good” transit by local standards, had appallingly bad transit and car-optimized cities.
Re:After 48 hours we haven't seen any sign people are using ...
by stevenwoo on Saturday December 08, 2018 @09:37PM
(#18638904)
Here's an interesting overview of US cities mass transit by an urban planner from Houston (an admittedly vary car centric place.)
https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2018/12/7/18131132/public-tran...
Re:After 48 hours we haven't seen any sign people are using ...
by loeg on Saturday December 08, 2018 @09:36PM
(#18638899)
US transit is heavily optimized for cars, even in places with pretty good mass transit. Don't let your personal experience with US metros color your expectations for what public transit can be.
Re:After 48 hours we haven't seen any sign people are using ...
by blattimwind on Saturday December 08, 2018 @10:43PM
(#18639124)
> with a transit system mostly regarded as 'pretty good'
That's probably US bias, because as far as I can tell by reporting US public transport is generally very bad and far worse in big cities compared to much smaller cities elsewhere.
I think what it comes down to is that if you have a subway system, that will probably beat cars, in the limited area it serves. Once you have to do transfers to buses, it gets much slower. In the places I've visited with subway systems (SF, DC primarily) this is definitely the case.