News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Getting to Xanadu by mimixco on Saturday December 08, 2018 @12:24PM (#18636290)
None of that belongs in a tool for readers and writers and it won't be part of Mimix.
Re:Getting to Xanadu by Fnoord on Saturday December 08, 2018 @02:01PM (#18636859)
What is Mimix in a nutshell? I found [1], but there is hardly a summary in this PDF.

[1] https://mimix.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/On-Mim...

Re:Getting to Xanadu by mimixco on Saturday December 08, 2018 @06:33PM (#18638152)
Thanks for asking. A better summary is definitely needed. I short, Mimix is a tool for reading, writing, learning, and teaching which makes it easier to include and share factual information in you're writing.
Re:Getting to Xanadu by no_identd on Saturday December 08, 2018 @07:38PM (#18638421)
You REALLY ought to learn about transcopyright:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3l7CpnpyGw

Re:Getting to Xanadu by mimixco on Wednesday December 12, 2018 @01:34PM (#18666447)
No, because that's not part of what we're building. It was Ted's dream to control a copyright and publishing empire. It is my dream to enable and empower individual creators and consumers of textual information. Mimix will not engage in copyright issues for the same reason that VS Code does not involve itself in the licensing aspects of the code you write. It's simply the wrong tool for the job. Our tool is focused on helping writers and readers to Think Better. It has no functions related to intellectual property enforcement.
Re:Getting to Xanadu by no_identd on Monday December 17, 2018 @10:35AM (#18699551)
I'll try to make my point via a completely different avenue:

Would you use Mimix to utilize transclusion to edit the code of Mimix & to distribute it?

Re:Getting to Xanadu by em-bee on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @06:58AM (#18715032)
i think what they are talking about is to provide technical means for the xanadu features, while leaving the legal questions to others.

so i suppose that mimix will support transclusion, but it's up to the user to figure out whether transcluding a certain document is a copyright violation or not.

interestingly, iframes in html are an example of transclusion, so this is not exactly a new feature, and there are discussions on copyright about it:

https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/07/is-the-diggbar-co...

https://policyreview.info/articles/news/eu-ruling-embedding-...

(funny how that seemingly contradicts the link-tax which started this branch of the discussion. i can transclude but i have to pay for a link?)