Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by beaconstudios on Wednesday December 05, 2018 @11:49AM
(#18609970)
no-one looks at the Laurie Penny types and their "cool hair" and thinks they'll portray a positive (or even neutral/journalistic) image of libertarians.
Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by rebolek on Wednesday December 05, 2018 @03:37PM
(#18612264)
Positive image of libertarians. OK.
Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by atomical on Wednesday December 05, 2018 @11:51AM
(#18610002)
It reinforced your understanding that crypto is not long for this world even though we never learned from the article how many people were on the cruise?
Plenty of thought leaders in crypto were not on this cruise. It's easy to cherry pick your opinions from one event where people behave poorly.
Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by malvosenior on Wednesday December 05, 2018 @11:45AM
(#18609916)
Except she's Laurie Penny who has been an extremely active anti-men writer for a long time. If they were expecting anything other than the worst hatchet job imaginable, then they didn't do even 5 minutes of research.
Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by sandworm101 on Wednesday December 05, 2018 @11:52AM
(#18610003)
You honestly think these people read her bio? The people promoting this cruise didn't get past her headshot. I'm interested to see which other journalists were invited.
Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by malvosenior on Wednesday December 05, 2018 @11:53AM
(#18610016)
I think she's perhaps more well known for this type of thing than you realize.
Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by atomical on Wednesday December 05, 2018 @11:58AM
(#18610078)
So they probably wanted her to write a piece like this to generate controversy?
Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by malvosenior on Wednesday December 05, 2018 @12:01PM
(#18610107)
Possibly, but I don't think it's an accident to put literally the most hostile journalist imaginable on board.
Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by pjc50 on Wednesday December 05, 2018 @12:07PM
(#18610168)
Nah, the most hostile journalist possible would have been the FT's Izabella Kaminska. Or possibly David Gerard.
Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by davidgerard on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @11:53AM
(#18656638)
FT would have been Jemima Kelly. https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2018/08/02/1533182400000/One-for...
If I'd gone I'd definitely have tried for the McAfee interview. As it was I just made sure Laurie had read my book first.
(of course we know each other, it's the worldwide SJW conspiracy)
Re:Four Days Trapped at Sea With Crypto’s Nouveau Riche
by roguecoder on Thursday December 06, 2018 @07:30PM
(#18624011)
Grouping the people she writes about under "men" is an insult to the rest of us.
This is how this level of journalism works: CyproCruise has a promotion budget. That budget includes "free" tickets for journalists. They offer these tickets to hip/cool outlets but, as this is a cruise, they need the name of the journalist before actually sending the ticket. So hip/cool outlet sends bio/headshot of the journalist they want to send.
She is admittedly short, petite, young and has cool hair. In her headshot she probably looks 22. Boxes ticked. Cryptocruise sees her both as another attractive female and, being misogynist pigs, thinks her incapable of doing any real damage. So she gets the ticket. Whether her bosses tell her they have paid for the ticket, or that it has been provided, we can never know.
Everyone got what they thought they wanted. Cryptocruise got another attractive female on their boat, and at a discount. News outlet got what they wanted: a colorful description of exactly how misogynist crypto has become. And we readers go our thing too: I actually read the entire article. It reinforced my understanding and assured me that cypto is not long for this world, at least in its current form. Everyone got their thing and made a few bucks doing so. That's how journalism works.
[Think of how awful the article might have been. Imagine if they had sent a 45yo hetero guy, someone who might have fallen in with a very different crowd on this boat.]