Re:Amazon's cloud business is competing with its own customers
by jf- on Sunday December 02, 2018 @04:06PM
(#18584558)
I don’t see how you interpreted it that way - anything released with a proprietary license, or closed source and not released at all, is proprietary. The fact that it’s derivative of an MIT or similarly licensed work makes no difference.
Re:Amazon's cloud business is competing with its own customers
by SquishyPanda23 on Sunday December 02, 2018 @04:31PM
(#18584672)
Yes, sorry, I thought you were giving it a normative interpretation, but you were just stating a fact.
I agree that your statement is correct.
I'm not sure I'm reading your statement correctly, but it sounds like you're saying that anything not developed under a copyleft license is proprietary.
If it was important for authors to receive contributions from derivative works, why would they have selected a license that doesn't require that?