Re:Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router (2004)
by jayess on Friday November 30, 2018 @10:02AM
(#18569532)
It mentions mixmaster and mixminion, but those projects seem to have died. I feel like they are needed more than ever.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router (2004)
by simmons on Friday November 30, 2018 @10:45AM
(#18569873)
Indeed. I've often thought that such high-latency mix-nets (with their potentially superior resistance to traffic analysis) would be a nice complement to low-latency networks like Tor.
Re:Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router (2004)
by ahf on Friday November 30, 2018 @12:01PM
(#18570452)
Have a look at Katzenpost. They are trying to build a modern, high-latency, mix network.
Re:Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router (2004)
by admax88q on Friday November 30, 2018 @02:52PM
(#18572074)
I2P provides cover traffic. I believe GNUnet can also be configured to use a certain amount of cover traffic.
Re:Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router (2004)
by jandrese on Friday November 30, 2018 @04:45PM
(#18572963)
The downside is that browsing the web on a service like that sucks ass. Tor trades off some security for a basic level of user experience.
Sadly, modern web design makes stuff like WWWoffle less useful than it used to be. Plus it's difficult to set up fully anonymous services on the far side of the link, I mean you're using Tor for a reason, and leaving breadcrumbs on the far side of the network is risky.