Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview

Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview by m_mueller on Friday November 30, 2018 @08:45AM (#18569025)

Also holds for someone saying "I'm intelligent" and "trust me".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview by timdellinger on Friday November 30, 2018 @11:00AM (#18569984)

Definitely true for anything named a "Center of Excellence"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview by mathattack on Friday November 30, 2018 @09:11AM (#18569201)

And “Frankly” and “I’ll be honest”...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview by rodeoclown on Friday November 30, 2018 @10:31AM (#18569760)

I've head this comment before, but from my own speech I don't find this to be true at all. It usually means I'm saying something I perceive to be more vulnerable or direct than any party to the conversation has been to that point - not at all that I was being deceptive before that point or after.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview by InitialLastName on Friday November 30, 2018 @12:00PM (#18570445)

> vulnerable or direct than any party to the conversation has been to that point

You seem to be sort of acknowledging the contradiction in this one. If the conversation is guarded (self-protecting vulnerability) or indirect, then it isn't being frank.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview by dcow on Friday November 30, 2018 @01:09PM (#18571067)

But what follows Frankly is genuine whereas in the other examples the target phrase is used to reinforce a deceitful stance.

[ Parent | on HN ]