Go 2, here we come

Re:Go 2, here we come by quickthrower2 on Thursday November 29, 2018 @04:14PM (#18564084)

I get you point. I'd probably go float/double precision for that task.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go 2, here we come by pvg on Thursday November 29, 2018 @05:25PM (#18564718)

Then you can lose precision that you might actually need - a bug that's even more annoying to track down than straight overflow.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go 2, here we come by quickthrower2 on Thursday November 29, 2018 @07:09PM (#18565420)

Yes indeed! But what is the alternative, especially if you are using approximations to transcendental constants?

[ Parent | on HN ]