News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Math and Analogies by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @03:39PM (#18555430)
I believe the ancient Romans would disagree? They had complicated rules for borrowing and simplifying, but of course it had to be done or they had nothing.
Re:Math and Analogies by jacobolus on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @08:10PM (#18557304)
> complicated rules for borrowing and simplifying [..] or they had nothing

Maybe you can explain what you are referring to here?

Ancient Greeks and Romans simply did not do arithmetic with pen and paper. They used a counting board with counters or pebbles (“calculi”), or for simpler problems used their fingers or did the work in their heads.

Doing computation was literally called “placing pebbles”, and to settle accounts with someone you would “call them to the pebbles”.

Roman numerals were not a tool for computation. They were a tool for recording data or results. The purpose of Roman numerals was to faithfully record in writing the placement of counters on a counting board. The position of the counting board (or perhaps in some contexts a pile of coins of various denominations) was the primary representation of numbers, and Roman numerals were secondary.

Re:Math and Analogies by Koshkin on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @04:50PM (#18556016)
The Romans heavily relied on the abacus. It used the 10-based positional representation of numbers.