News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by udpkts on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @12:50PM (#18553747)
This is what I use protected git repo with a pgp signature for.
Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by ajkjk on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @12:55PM (#18553803)
What throughput do you get with that?
Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by DanielBMarkham on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @12:57PM (#18553818)
Is there a need for high throughput in some domain?
Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by ajkjk on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @01:02PM (#18553892)
Yes? Name any domain and there's somebody who wants high-throughput auditable transactions in it.
Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by DanielBMarkham on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @01:05PM (#18553930)
From a centralized source?

So sure. Voting. Wouldn't it be great to have an auditable trail?

But why would you then go and put all of that in one spot?

Wouldn't a better approach be reconfiguring the tech to work in a faster fashion?

Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by EGreg on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @04:02PM (#18555666)
I also don’t get it. Auditable trail? Use a Merkle DAG. Or something like this Permissionless Timestamping Network: https://intercoin.pdf/whitepaper.pdf

I mean how hard is it? What are the real challenges?

Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by DanielBMarkham on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @05:01PM (#18556096)
Glad it's not just me.

Elsewhere they say something like "But it works like a database! You do queries and everything!"

Ok. So sign a database.

It's like they're expecting developers to not know a damned thing about blockchain, but know they want a secure database and something with cool buzzwords in the name and AWS has one for them as long as they have a credit card.

AWS needs to provide clear and compelling places where AWS is not the answer to everything. I am not hearing that, and it indicates to me a lack of appropriate executive direction. Yeah, sure, build a cult. But build a cult with guardrails.

I'm not sure that this is the "Make stuff people want" that I would be comfortable pumping to others. I don't know. I must be missing it.

Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by ajkjk on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @01:51PM (#18554415)
Why wouldn't you put it all in one spot? The technical requirement of needing an audit table is ubiquitous and I bet almost every SQL database in history eventually ends up having a history table of some sort. This technical requirement is unrelated to any regulatory requirements about (not) storing data in the cloud, and certainly shouldn't be coupled to it.
Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by mschaef on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @01:24PM (#18554128)
Can you (have you?) say anything more publicly? Would be interested to know more.
Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by lozenge on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @02:20PM (#18554714)
Git and QLDB both use the Merkle tree concept to prove that history hasn't been edited. The GPG signing proves new events are coming from a trusted person or computer.
Re:Amazon Quantum Ledger Database by mschaef on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @02:54PM (#18555040)
Thanks. (I'm actually aware of the mechanisms involved and have implemented something similar in the past, although with a rather different set of tradeoffs.)

My main interested was in use cases and the details of the integration with git.