It sounds similar to Freenet then, with perhaps less of a stress on anonymity.
Odd that you choose their second highest tier to fit your narrative instead of just jumping to their highest tier with is actually symmetrical 2Gbps up and down fiber.
Also, that $300/month is the introductory price. Lord knows what the actual price is once the initial 2 year period is over.
That's exactly what it's marketed as. There are also plenty of symmetrical fiber services with hundreds of Mbps of upload from Frontier, Verizon, AT&T, and others.
> There are also plenty of symmetrical fiber services with hundreds of Mbps of upload from Frontier, Verizon, AT&T, and others.
Most people don't have a lot of options.
The options in my neighborhood are either 150 mbps down/5 mbps up with Comcast, or 35 mbps symmetrical with Frontier.
If you have more than two options, and one of them is gigabit, you're extremely lucky. A considerable chunk of America only has 1 option, and the extreme majority doesn't have gigabit down, let alone gigabit up.
Just because something is expensive and therefore unpopular to your average consumer does not mean the product itself does not exist. If we're talking about residential ISP speed, then all residential ISPs and their respective tiers should be included.
Otherwise you're just picking and choosing data points to fit a narrative which is deceiving.
Are you slipping back out of context to talk about business again?
No, they're not.
Sure, if you live somewhere where you can get 1 gigabit fiber, maybe. But I know Comcast/Xfinity throttles the crap out of your upload. Even if you get their 1 gigabit plan, your upload is limited to 35 mbps [0].
To put that into perspective, if you have a 1 megabyte image that ends up getting linked on reddit and 100,000 people try to download it in an hour, then you'd need over 200 Mbps upload. Very very few home users have that kind of connection.
[0] https://www.cabletv.com/xfinity/internet