News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chat app fined for plaintext passwords under GDPR by nkkollaw on Monday November 26, 2018 @07:20AM (#18532778)
The maximum penalty is a small percentage of earnings of 1 year. I doubt this will bankrupt any company. There are other laws that can do a lot more damage.

In this case, storing passwords in plain text is equivalent to building cars with defective breaks. Definitely something the government should punish.

Re:Chat app fined for plaintext passwords under GDPR by danielbln on Monday November 26, 2018 @07:39AM (#18532883)
"In some cases, violators of the GDPR may be fined up to €20 million or up to 4% of the annual worldwide turnover of the preceding financial year in case of an enterprise, whichever is greater."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regula...

Re:Chat app fined for plaintext passwords under GDPR by nkkollaw on Monday November 26, 2018 @10:07AM (#18533789)
Ah,I missed the 20M part :-D
Re:Chat app fined for plaintext passwords under GDPR by LyndsySimon on Monday November 26, 2018 @09:54AM (#18533704)
> storing passwords in plain text is equivalent to building cars with defective breaks

This strikes me as hyperbole. Storing passwords in plaintext is a serious security issue, to the point of gross negligence - but the potential harm isn't even in the same ballpark. If your password is compromised and you have poor security practices, you could lose access to online services and perhaps even suffer significant financial loss. If your brakes fail you stand a good chance of death or serious injury.

Re:Chat app fined for plaintext passwords under GDPR by nkkollaw on Monday November 26, 2018 @10:10AM (#18533804)
That's kind of obvious.

Car makers might have a bigger responsibility, but the amount of negligence is the same IMO. Many people recycle passwords, so having a company storing yours in plain text has the potential to ruin someone's life.

Re:Chat app fined for plaintext passwords under GDPR by httpsterio on Monday November 26, 2018 @05:17PM (#18537337)
4% of global annual turnover, not profit.

If you sell 10,000 pieces of 15 dollar items for 20 dollars, your turnover is 200,000 dollars but your profit is 50,000 dollars because the cost of your investment was 1 50,000 dollars.

4% of the turnover would be 8000, which is suddenly 16% of your profits in this case. Oops.

Then you have to take into account that this is your global turnover. Your one branch in Germany made a mistake and suddenly the whole worldwide company has to pay.

Microsofts turnover last year was a 100B roughly. That could end up being a 4 billion dollar fine. 20 million dollars is peanuts compared to what it could be in the worst case. Hundreds of companies could take a 20m fine and not go bankrupt but a 4% global turnover fine will kill almost any company.

[dead]
Re:Chat app fined for plaintext passwords under GDPR by skj on Monday November 26, 2018 @09:53AM (#18533699)
There are polite ways to correct someone's spelling.
Re:Chat app fined for plaintext passwords under GDPR by downandout on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @05:12AM (#18541048)
Civility hasn't been a thing on HN for quite some time now, especially in any polarized thread. It's terrible, but even the moderators get in on the action by taking sides and burying viewpoints they don't like. This allows the Valley's toxic monoculture to shine through, which leads to rude comments like this one. Notice how that comment wasn't even flagged.
Re:Chat app fined for plaintext passwords under GDPR by nkkollaw on Monday November 26, 2018 @02:12PM (#18535957)
You don't have to swear because of a typo, English is not my first language.

You look much dumber than the person you're correcting by acting like that.