Re:First gene-edited babies claimed in China
by buboard on Monday November 26, 2018 @03:13AM
(#18531842)
of course it is not the same. but i think the argument was on the unborn baby 's rights being violated because of the genetic procedure.
Also this is not a case of arbitrary experimentation, the parents ARE preventing an inherited genetic issue, which is something that so far has been ethically acceptable so far, for embryo selection.
Re:First gene-edited babies claimed in China
by onetimemanytime on Monday November 26, 2018 @03:35AM
(#18531939)
>>the parents ARE preventing an inherited genetic issue
The parents THINK they ARE preventing an inherited genetic issue. I would not dare mess with "god's creation" /evolution. Too many unknowns once you start mix and matching and there's no going back. We know very little...
Re:First gene-edited babies claimed in China
by buboard on Monday November 26, 2018 @03:59AM
(#18532016)
then you should not have children, but you should clone yourself. because your children are certainly going to be a messed up version of god's creation
Re:First gene-edited babies claimed in China
by onetimemanytime on Monday November 26, 2018 @04:51AM
(#18532198)
>>because your children are certainly going to be a messed up version of god's creation
Nope, whatever happens it's the natural way: mistakes, mix, match and all.
In other words, taking action to make changes is a crucial difference when compared to inaction, even if the outcomes are similar.