News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thank you to dang and sctb by pvg on Friday November 23, 2018 @01:41AM (#18514796)
smelling of tribalism/favoritism.

Downvoting something for complaining about votes is fairly normal. Downvote baiting on top is flagworthy. I imagine lots of people quite sensibly apply these as a matter of course.

Re:Thank you to dang and sctb by mercer on Sunday November 25, 2018 @11:11AM (#18527408)
With some exceptions I downvote any comment that complains about downvotes. I'm not 100% comfortable about it, and I might change my approach, but so far rigorously applying the rules seems to be working. I'm willing to bet I'm not the only one to do so.
Re:Thank you to dang and sctb by dieterrams on Friday November 23, 2018 @01:54AM (#18514846)
One imagines they do. I'm not sure that's what's going on here, though.
Re:Thank you to dang and sctb by pvg on Friday November 23, 2018 @03:29AM (#18515152)
Why wouldn't exactly that be going on here? It's a grade-A downvotable, flaggable comment.
Re:Thank you to dang and sctb by dieterrams on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @11:55PM (#18558204)
Jesus Christ.

Suppose he is being treated unfairly by the mods. Is that not worth complaining about?

I don't give a crap about some silly "downvote every comment complaining about downvotes" rule. Complaining about downvotes was frowned upon because people get inexplicably downvoted as a matter of course here, and the frequency of complaints was deemed sufficiently detracting to warrant being frowned upon. Being treated unfairly by the mods, however, is another matter entirely.

I haven't seen a preponderance of evidence suggesting the complaint was ill-founded, and the guy's tenure and comment history (what I looked through of it) do not suggest he's an ill-mannered troll, so I reserve judgement as to whether the complaint is in the wrong. Like any reasonable person would.