Re:Popular dark-web hosting provider hacked, 6,500 sites down
by na412 on Thursday November 22, 2018 @06:10AM
(#18509281)
Onion services can have various goals. Hiding the server is a very common one, but it's not always the case.
For example facebook runs an onion server for their service, they don't need to hide the service itself. So they configure their Tor relays with no anonymity on the service side (HiddenServiceSingleHopMode 1) and get better performance.
Such non-anonymous onion services can have many goals, for example:
* Reducing load on Tor exit nodes
* Providing users a secure, authenticated connection without depending on the CA system (assuming you got the URL through a secure channel the first time, you know only the key holder can provide service on that host).
* NAT traversal for services that otherwise have no need for anonymity
For example facebook runs an onion server for their service, they don't need to hide the service itself. So they configure their Tor relays with no anonymity on the service side (HiddenServiceSingleHopMode 1) and get better performance.
Such non-anonymous onion services can have many goals, for example: * Reducing load on Tor exit nodes * Providing users a secure, authenticated connection without depending on the CA system (assuming you got the URL through a secure channel the first time, you know only the key holder can provide service on that host). * NAT traversal for services that otherwise have no need for anonymity