Re:Popular dark-web hosting provider hacked, 6,500 sites down
by belorn on Thursday November 22, 2018 @04:38AM
(#18508958)
Either the HN link has changed or the article has been edited but the word porn is not found in the article.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Popular dark-web hosting provider hacked, 6,500 sites down
by pure-awesome on Thursday November 22, 2018 @06:40AM
(#18509389)
Weird, you're right.
It definitely referenced it when I first read the article.
I wonder what the motivation would be for removing that reference.
EDIT: Note that I am not user "runn1ng"; I am corroborating what they referenced about the contents of the article
EDIT2: They even mentioned three-or-so specific forums or websites, or something.
Re:Popular dark-web hosting provider hacked, 6,500 sites down
by dejaime on Thursday November 22, 2018 @04:07PM
(#18512563)
They changed the link. It was pointing to another one that cited this one as the source and added -even more- speculation on top of it.
Re:Popular dark-web hosting provider hacked, 6,500 sites down
by dejaime on Thursday November 22, 2018 @04:23PM
(#18512668)
Here you go https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2018/11/21/hacker-erases-65...
This adds speculation and sensationalism on top of an ill informed article. They even defined it as a 0-day vulnerability, when it is obviously not the case as explained by the article itself. Can't simply trust the quality of the information in there.