News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Life inside MPEG by shmerl on Monday November 19, 2018 @11:27PM (#18491791)
Software patents protection racket is a morally bankrupt "business model". It only exists because of the broken legal system that allows such parasites to slow down progress.
Re:Life inside MPEG by freeone3000 on Monday November 19, 2018 @11:36PM (#18491817)
They're not slowing down progress AT ALL - their patent is remarkably easy to understand, their reference implementation is available, and if you wanted to reimplement it, they will send you a complete spec by email! They are using patents for their intended purpose - they're making money by licensing the method of doing something they figured out how to do better than anybody else.
Re:Life inside MPEG by shmerl on Monday November 19, 2018 @11:42PM (#18491841)
If you don't know how software patents are slowing down progress, there are a lot of materials that explain it in detail. Some might be proponents of that approach (for the sake of profiteering), but claiming that it's helping progress is hypocrisy.
Re:Life inside MPEG by rayiner on Monday November 19, 2018 @11:32PM (#18491800)
While software patents may be broken in many instances, I don’t think video codecs are one of them. It’s not like MPEG-LA is suing people for using independently-developed designs that just happen to infringe. If you’re infringing the MPEG patents it’s likely because you’re purposefully building on their work.

And that’s okay in my book. I much preferred the old days when everyone just paid Sony and Panasonic for a license than the current model where “free” codecs are bankrolled by spying on everyone’s email and helping Russians fix elections.

Re:Life inside MPEG by vetinari on Tuesday November 20, 2018 @08:48AM (#18493726)
> It’s not like MPEG-LA is suing people for using independently-developed designs that just happen to infringe

I think you missed the whole FUD campaign against VPx, where they tried to persuade the public that VPx does infringe patents in their pool.

Re:Life inside MPEG by CamperBob2 on Monday November 19, 2018 @11:51PM (#18491872)
The problem comes in when patents have the effect of walling off an entire subfield of computer science from the perspective of the commercial R&D world.

Classic cases in point are IBM's patent on arithmetic encoding, which rendered that entire class of algorithms radioactive in the 1980s-1990s era, and the original Lempel-Ziv patent claims dating back to 1978.

We are most certainly not better off as a society because we granted decade+ monopolies on those claims, and I see no reason to think any differently of MPEG.

Re:Life inside MPEG by shmerl on Monday November 19, 2018 @11:38PM (#18491825)
MPEG-LA are actively trying to impede development of open codecs, or slow them down with FUD and threats. They are acting like a classic racketeer thug. I'm surprised some are trying to whitewash their behavior. I guess glorified mafia is the way to "move things into the future" according to MPEG-LA supporters.