News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Make vs. Tup (2016) by aidenn0 on Monday November 19, 2018 @12:27PM (#18487974)
My two favorite make alternatives make HN in two consecutive days.

I like redo because with make you need to know two languages, with redo you know just one, the interface is simple and you get automatic dependency on build rules for free. Also the implementation is so much simpler than make, and yet I've not run into a feature I miss from make.

I like tup because it is very opinionated and forces you to write your build scripts in a reasonable manner, while also being very fast and very correct. It might be possible to write a tup file that incorrectly handles dependencies, but you'd have to work hard to do so.

Re:Make vs. Tup (2016) by majewsky on Monday November 19, 2018 @01:10PM (#18488342)
Do you have a link to the redo story? I can't seem to find it on hckrnews.com
Re:Make vs. Tup (2016) by ksherlock on Monday November 19, 2018 @01:23PM (#18488435)
Re:Make vs. Tup (2016) by aidenn0 on Monday November 19, 2018 @02:33PM (#18489012)
That's the one
Re:Make vs. Tup (2016) by JdeBP on Tuesday November 20, 2018 @06:44AM (#18493141)