News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by int_19h on Monday November 19, 2018 @01:12AM (#18484497)
I can think of quite a few qualified people that'd be happy to move to a small town in the middle of nowhere, if they could work in a place like Google, get the same paycheck as their colleagues in California offices, but have a significantly lower cost of living. So I don't think that's really a problem - they would certainly have enough people to kickstart such a thing, and then it would just grow.
Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by kethinov on Monday November 19, 2018 @03:11AM (#18484837)
This.

It's truly amazing to me how much elitism is oozing in this thread from people who just keep repeating as though it is some well known fact that good people only want to live in big cities, hence suffering cities clearly are only suffering because there is something fundamentally, immutably undesirable about them.

People need to drop these elitist attitudes. A huge number of tech workers would love to leave SF, NYC, etc if only the damn jobs would let them.

Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by usaar333 on Monday November 19, 2018 @12:32PM (#18488016)
The question is would your highly paid workers (needed to lead the ship) move. I've seen in practice very few who would.. most that have moved because of desires to be near family, but that reason won't create a singular new hot spot for tech.
Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by lotsofpulp on Monday November 19, 2018 @09:31AM (#18486606)
If what you say is true, then surely it would be reflected in reality.
Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by kethinov on Monday November 19, 2018 @08:03PM (#18491095)
It is reflected in reality. The vast majority of GitLab's exclusively remote workforce does not live in SF or NYC.

If more companies offered such terms, the labor pool would spread out more.

Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by Apocryphon on Monday November 19, 2018 @01:00PM (#18488271)
It could be, if only large companies would attempt to move to smaller cities, and show any interest in following through with that intention.
Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by lotsofpulp on Monday November 19, 2018 @04:22PM (#18489862)
I’m saying it must not be to their economic benefit, otherwise it would have happened already.
Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by kethinov on Monday November 19, 2018 @08:04PM (#18491098)
The market is not perfectly rational. Sometimes companies do things that are against their economic interests due to irrational perceptions to the contrary.
Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by feri339 on Monday November 19, 2018 @05:18AM (#18485335)
But that's not gonna happen. They will most likely not get the same paycheck as their colleagues on the coasts. Mostly because the cost of living is much lower.

Edit: In my experience I have more net money if I work in place with high cost of living and high comp compared to the opposite.

Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by int_19h on Monday November 19, 2018 @08:08AM (#18486118)
> But that's not gonna happen. They will most likely not get the same paycheck as their colleagues on the coasts. Mostly because the cost of living is much lower.

See, there's no logic to it once you unpack it. If the company is willing to pay $X for a given person in one location, they can obviously afford to pay $X to them in another location - they're not any worse for that, since they get the same productivity in return (quite possibly more, because less commute time == happier employees).

But yes, in practice, they will lower the pay - and then complain that they can't hire anyone in those locations...

Re:Google could buy $110M worth of land, without subsidies, ... by feri339 on Monday November 19, 2018 @10:51AM (#18487217)
Technically the truth. But they might not get the same productivity because the team you'd be joining would be in SF or wherever. If remote working were perfect and the norm then no problem.