Re:Computing Higher Order Derivatives of Matrix and Tensor E...
by bmc7505 on Friday November 16, 2018 @07:38AM
(#18468306)
Would be interesting to explore whether evaluating ∇²f(x) for higher-order SGD methods directly is now feasible for smaller DNNs and whether this leads to faster convergence during training. Most methods like Newton or Gauss-newton were thought intractable for DNNs. Also curious if the angle descent prescribed by quasi-Newton methods is empirically closer to the true 2nd order gradient and whether these approximations are useful in wall-clock time.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Computing Higher Order Derivatives of Matrix and Tensor E...
by jkam on Friday November 16, 2018 @03:04PM
(#18471554)
What kind of work are you referring to when you say higher-order SGD may _now_ be feasible for deep learning?
I only find results that try to approximate second order information.
Re:Computing Higher Order Derivatives of Matrix and Tensor E...
by bmc7505 on Saturday November 24, 2018 @10:44PM
(#18525359)
Not sure what you mean. The paper above claims 1000x speedups for computing second-order derivatives. Have not tested their claims, but was speculating that such an improvement, if true, would make computing hessians for small networks fesiable. This is what I am referring to.