Re:People are “consistently inconsistent” in reasoning about...
by fghtr on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @11:43AM
(#18442350)
On what is it based then? There are computer simulations ("hypotheses"), which scientists compare with available data ("verifications"). Then verified simulation tools are applied to predict what happens depending on our behavior. The latter part is a hypothesis without a test, but if it turns out to be true, we are in trouble. It's better to trust it and take action...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:People are “consistently inconsistent” in reasoning about...
by gadders on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @01:23PM
(#18443329)
Obligatory Dilbert Cartoon: http://dilbert.com/strip/2017-05-14
Re:People are “consistently inconsistent” in reasoning about...
by crooked-v on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @01:50PM
(#18443623)
Of course, one must consider that the climate models that have gotten ignored over the years have generally been ignored because they were too pessimistic, despite those ones turning out to be the more accurate ones.