Outside that, I've heard mark of the beast from so many people about so many things over the decades that I'm sure it factors into a lot of political decisions where popular vote counts. The wording is kind of catch-all given mark is so ambiguous, it mentions a name, and it has a number. A person can project it on anything.
I still wish we had all followed the Yuki (base 8), it would have made computing so much easier.
I doubt most Christians think the bible is a broken clock
> Just because someone wrote a pre-scientific text which, today, supports antiauthoritarianism ... does not mean that antiauthoritarianism lacks its many other merits.
Most of our culture and philosophy comes from pre-scientific texts. Authoritarianism didn't need science and the ability to stop certain people from participating in commerce doesn't require computers.
> (Not to mention how even some Christians think that Revelation is the writings of a hallucinating madman.)
A small number, while other groups have different interpretations of what the text means or how literal it is.
They are completely useless until misattributed in hindsight, until further reattributed in hindsight to something slightly more coincidentally relevant. 500 years of this so far.