News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Not Make? by tom_ on Thursday November 08, 2018 @09:12AM (#18406325)
It's for your day-to-day builds, so when you switch between build types while working you don't have to suffer a full rebuild.
Re:Why Not Make? by rusk on Thursday November 08, 2018 @09:18AM (#18406381)
by build-types you mean release to test vs. build for my own work? All my code gets released off a build server, and I'd consider it bad practice for a developer to be releasing their own code from their own workspace ...
Re:Why Not Make? by tom_ on Thursday November 08, 2018 @09:59AM (#18406628)
Same build, sure, but you don't release it - you just run it on your own computer, as opposed to the development build you might ordinarily run, to make sure you didn't break anything.
Re:Why Not Make? by rusk on Thursday November 08, 2018 @10:35AM (#18406954)
I still can't help but feel this could be obviated by a more top-down approach, like decomposing into modules.

Even with a well-specified dependency tree there are areas where an incremental build can still bite you in the ass. Things like inlining and transitive dependencies ... I think you still need to build from scratch to be sure.