Re:Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
by wingerlang on Wednesday November 07, 2018 @01:46AM
(#18397485)
I agree 100% about the life changing part. But for a cheap solution, go with a hose attached to the toilet. I'd say I prefer them over the Japanese versions. More versatile and the only thing you really lose is the .. heating?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
by lsc on Wednesday November 07, 2018 @03:51AM
(#18397889)
I do agree that the shower hose looking thing next to the toilet cleans just as well and is a lot cheaper, but for my money? I personally think the automatic nature of the toto is an entirely different (and, imho, better) overall experience.
(and the heating is not to be underestimated)
Re:Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
by halbritt on Wednesday November 07, 2018 @06:06PM
(#18403129)
Maybe. My thing has adjustable pressure, it oscillates, and one can adjust the location.
The warmed water is nice, but it has an "eco" mode so there are definitely times when it's not warmed and it's no big deal. I'd guess the biggest advantage would be the ability to just sit there and have the robotic arm take care of things for you without having to move around.