As women have more equal opportunity, the more their preferences differ from men

Re:As women have more equal opportunity, the more their pref... by sokoloff on Monday November 05, 2018 @03:48PM (#18385829)

> You don't care _how_ they spent those 5k hours...simply that they have them?

I didn’t go deep, because this isn’t an aviation forum, but sure the quality of hours matters. Retract, multi, instrument, PIC, dual given, high-performance, turbine, jet, 91, 135, 121, etc all matter. Smash-n-goes in a 172 aren’t the same as flying the line/signing for a transport jet.

Anything past the FAA ATP 1500 hour mark, the quality matters. Before that, quantity dominates for airline candidates.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:As women have more equal opportunity, the more their pref... by Ari_Ugwu on Tuesday November 06, 2018 @03:49PM (#18394775)

Blerg. Then also an apology. You did say that your post was in your _opinion_. I chose to engage. You were kind enough to respond and expand on your opinion. If I missed that and used a needlessly harsh tone then please know that was not my intent. At least not originally.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:As women have more equal opportunity, the more their pref... by sokoloff on Sunday November 11, 2018 @05:57PM (#18429250)

No sweat; it's impossible in a typical HN-length post to cover every possible expansion of an argument; I took no offense to the post that ended up flagged/dead [by others] and hope I gave no offense with my own.

[ Parent | on HN ]