Re:Housing can’t both be a good investment and be affordable
by toasterlovin on Saturday November 03, 2018 @12:31AM
(#18368706)
You’re being downvoted, but I agree with you. Having a system where the old benefit at the expense of the young is a shit way to organize things.
Re:Housing can’t both be a good investment and be affordable
by wycs on Friday November 02, 2018 @11:34PM
(#18368532)
>But like taxes, death is inevitable.
Taxes yes, but I am not so sure about death.
Re:Housing can’t both be a good investment and be affordable
by quickthrower2 on Monday November 05, 2018 @04:15AM
(#18380928)
Well your comment has been immortalised in hall of infame:
Re:Housing can’t both be a good investment and be affordable
by Mtinie on Saturday November 03, 2018 @12:15AM
(#18368655)
Sidebar:
Are we about to venture into a trans-humanist discussion, or a spiritual one?
I’m open to either, but I’d like to set the preliminary scope to narrow the available attack surface.
Re:Housing can’t both be a good investment and be affordable
by dragonwriter on Saturday November 03, 2018 @03:51AM
(#18369193)
> Are we about to venture into a trans-humanist discussion, or a spiritual one?
They aren't mutually exclusive.
Economically, I’ll consider it from a Machiavellian perspective:
The sooner limited, choice, resources are freed up for the younger generations the better. The Old were useful because they spawned, and raised, the young. As replacements, knowingly.