Re:British intelligence hacked Belgacom then sabotaged inves...
by echevil on Friday November 02, 2018 @12:35PM
(#18364417)
Well, if the competing theory (that UK is behind the nerve agents) is true, they also have good reasons not to cooperate.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:British intelligence hacked Belgacom then sabotaged inves...
by lostlogin on Friday November 02, 2018 @01:45PM
(#18365072)
Is it really a competing theory? This seems like discussing the competing theory for who shot down MH17 over Ukraine.
The Russian method of dealing the dissenting voices has been pretty consistent for over 100 years now. That doesn’t mean it’s always Russia, but every part of the story fits.
Re:British intelligence hacked Belgacom then sabotaged inves...
by jen20 on Friday November 02, 2018 @02:18PM
(#18365362)
The only people to whom that is a "competing theory" have an exceptionally high probability of being viewers of whatever the local equivalent to Fox News is.
Re:British intelligence hacked Belgacom then sabotaged inves...
by kevin_thibedeau on Friday November 02, 2018 @03:15PM
(#18365854)
Obviously it was Democrats who secretly deployed Novichok as part of a false flag operation.
Re:British intelligence hacked Belgacom then sabotaged inves...
by echevil on Friday November 02, 2018 @04:33PM
(#18366476)
You forgot there are people outside US? Outside its media bubble
Re:British intelligence hacked Belgacom then sabotaged inves...
by int_19h on Saturday November 03, 2018 @12:08AM
(#18368635)
Every place has its own media bubble. And, in many cases, those bubbles share the same conspiracy theories, especially when outside hostile actors deliberately stoke them. I assume that's why OP wrote "whatever the local equivalent to Fox News is".
Re:British intelligence hacked Belgacom then sabotaged inves...
by echevil on Saturday November 03, 2018 @01:15AM
(#18368845)
You get out of media bubble by reading news from very different sources. Otherwise you're inside it no matter what you read.