News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Machine learning spots natural selection at work in human... by dwiel on Friday November 02, 2018 @03:55AM (#18361304)
We know all of the rules of tic-tac-toe. We have no idea how much we dont know about genetics.

The things we know can still be incorporated in various ways with deep learning, but we avoid having to make as many obviously not universally applicable assumptions as with less complex statistical methods.

Re:Machine learning spots natural selection at work in human... by ssivark on Friday November 02, 2018 @04:30AM (#18361432)
> we avoid having to make as many obviously not universally applicable assumptions

The point of the above koan is that there are always assumptions (priors) whether you like them or not. You can make them explicit or random and unknown. This is the crux of the bias-variance tradeoff [1]. Whether deep NNs manage to circumvent that in any meaningful way (especially outside the domain of spatial/temporal analog signals) is an open question.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bias%E2%80%93variance_tradeoff

Re:Machine learning spots natural selection at work in human... by teekert on Friday November 02, 2018 @03:59AM (#18361321)
Exactly, there is simply no way for a human to understand this stuff without (some layers of) abstraction, each abstraction introduces bias and/or error.