Re:Compare career levels across companies
by nemo44x on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @11:20PM
(#18351217)
The truth is, in my experience, people in the major cities (and even some outside them) in the USA are the most highly compensated people on Earth. Canada and the EU have a lot of social systems that cost a lot of money. They have a lot of worker protections. This means it costs more to hire someone there and it is very difficult to get rid of them meaning more risk for the company. Because of this (and other reasons I'm sure) the wages are far lower.
In the low end and even mid-tier this probably works out better for Canada and the EU. But at the high end, which these jobs are, you're paying a large price compared to the USA. But hopefully you find the costs worth it.
Re:Compare career levels across companies
by parasubvert on Thursday November 01, 2018 @01:02AM
(#18351562)
Canada doesn’t have anywhere near the worker protections of the EU. It’s not quite “at will” employment but...
I live in Canada and work remotely for a US tech company which has helped keep my comp competitive. It not about laws or taxes really (ours aren’t much more than California really), it’s that the wage inflation / talent war hasn’t quite made it up here yet.
Re:Compare career levels across companies
by titanomachy on Thursday November 01, 2018 @12:17PM
(#18355506)
Seconded, I don't think it has anything to do with Canada's social programs. And it's pretty easy to fire someone, you just have to give them a small amount of severance depending on how long they've worked for you. I think the biggest factor is that it's much, much easier to import workers from Europe and Asia. I worked at a major tech company in Canada and the office was 50%+ foreign nationals who wouldn't have had authorization to work in the US anyway. A lot of the Canadian citizens eventually left to take 2-3x salaries in the States (there is a visa category that makes it really easy for Canadian engineers to work in the US.)
Re:Compare career levels across companies
by radicaldreamer on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @07:41PM
(#18350174)
This is the usual reaction for those outside the Bay Area. Cost of living is very high in SF though, as are home prices.
Re:Compare career levels across companies
by robynsmith on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @07:45PM
(#18350204)
True. But Toronto is pretty bad too. And we generally don't have the high levels of stock compensation. That looks like it could make a huge difference.
Re:Compare career levels across companies
by usaar333 on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @07:58PM
(#18350272)
Yes, but if you are capable of getting to senior levels at Google, COL in the Bay area is much less of a concern.
Re:Compare career levels across companies
by int_19h on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @09:33PM
(#18350787)
It doesn't only show Bay Area numbers, though, but also e.g. Seattle, where the prices (while still high) are far lower - especially in more remote places that still have a decent commute to tech campuses in Redmond, Kirkland and Bellevue.
Re:Compare career levels across companies
by randyrand on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @09:51PM
(#18350882)
worth noting that homes are expensive because compensation is high, not the other way around.
expensive housing does bring up low wages, but does not increase top level wages.
while savings rate stays the same despite CoL, total savings increases.
all else being equal, living in the bay is worth it despite the CoL for most developers
Re:Compare career levels across companies
by ttt111222333 on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @10:18PM
(#18351007)
Would be nice if people from Toronto would enter more data points for the more popular startups I.e. shopify, instacart, unata, ritual, league, top hat, wealthsimple, freshbooks, pivotal, ada, etc
Maybe I should be moving? Crazy.
(Sadly, family is here, so moving is unlikely)