Re:Transforming Wikipedia into a cultural knowledge quiz
by rahulcap on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @03:24PM
(#18348564)
Agreed that this is the hardest part is taking the quiz. Not sure if you'll see consistent interpretations based on age/education, but curious to see your analysis of this!
I thought the explanations in the "more info" box was very useful. I'd suggest keeping it open by default on the first page (closed on other pages) as it seems a critical to read that box before taking the quiz. Just a thought!
Re:Transforming Wikipedia into a cultural knowledge quiz
by skykooler on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @12:54PM
(#18347329)
This was also a bit confusing to me. "Goodfellas"? I knew that was a film (I've heard the name before), but I haven't seen it, and I couldn't tell you who's in it or what it's about. Does that count as "uniquely identifying?"
Re:Transforming Wikipedia into a cultural knowledge quiz
by Liquid_Fire on Thursday November 01, 2018 @02:21PM
(#18356860)
> Uniquely identify means you can identify the specific person or thing — not just a category.
> Just knowing someone is an “actor” isn't enough, because there are lots of actors. But if you can name their role in a specific movie or recognize them by sight, that’s uniquely identifying — so check the box!
So I would say no.
At the end of the day, your personal result will be for however you interpreted the instructions. But population-wide results should remain comparatively valid assuming each population is comparable in terms of being conservative/liberal with what they claim to know. E.g. you can still measure the difference between 25-year-olds and 30-year-olds because they're answering it in the same way collectively, and it's the differences I'm more interested in for research, than the absolute values.
I thought about making it something like a multiple-choice quiz, but it would have made the quiz a lot slower, and therefore either a lot longer or a lot less accurate, so checkboxes seemed like the only way to go.