Re:Technology preview: Sealed sender for Signal
by throwaway8879 on Monday October 29, 2018 @09:09PM
(#18333192)
What? Why is sms considered "elite secure messaging", as you put it? They don't have to "solve every problem" but just not asking for a real-world identifier like a phone number. Just ask for an email. It isn't that hard. The whole phone number thing is a massive turn off. Everyone has literally been using email since the advent of the internet. No all of a sudden we have to get sms involved for a service that provides secure messaging? Replacing phone number with email doesn't suddenly make it "elite".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Technology preview: Sealed sender for Signal
by toast0 on Monday October 29, 2018 @10:08PM
(#18333524)
Email is a generational thing. Older generations didn't have one. A lot of people getting on the internet today don't have one, either, especially in developing nations. But Android needs one, you say -- they'll get their tech friend or someone at the phone store to login once, so they can access the play store. But that's not secure, you say -- they don't necessarily care about that.
The nice thing about phone numbers is you put them into a non app specific address book, so your friends list is portable.
Re:Technology preview: Sealed sender for Signal
by Zarath on Monday October 29, 2018 @11:46PM
(#18333889)
Are people in developing nations even using Signal? If not, what problem is it even trying to solve? Who is your market here? Give privacy people what they want, most everyone else is going to use WhatsApp or WeChat anyway as far as I can tell.
Re:Technology preview: Sealed sender for Signal
by kasey_junk on Monday October 29, 2018 @09:16PM
(#18333227)
He’s presumably talking about WhatsApp