> A lot of the popular unrest facing both corporations & governments today is people learning that conflict gets results.

Conflict likes workers peaceful protests, union negotiations, and various acts of civil disobedience against the government are in a broad category of "conflict."

Corruption, violence, harassment, threats of violence, libel, literally burning parts of the world to the ground, incitements to violence, swatting, disinformation campaigns, and genocide are in another very broad category of conflict.

If your use of the word "conflicts" mixes anything freely from both two categories then the sentence I quoted is meaningless.

> The end result probably looks like us burning most of the modern world to the ground, literally, but that's where game theory is taking us.

If you are talking mainly about any of the things I mentioned in my first category of "conflict," then this sentence isn't persuasive.

If you are talking about the second category only, I don't understand the relationship to the article.