Here's some sources on this I found after a light search:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/06/man-indicted-for...

https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/09/07/red-light-robin-hood...

Edit: The study linked to in the original article gives me a 404. It's a link to the 2014 annual report's PDF. I couldn't find it elsewhere, but here's a link to 2015's annual report: http://suffolkcountyny.gov/Portals/37/PDF/Red%20Light%20Safe...

It's very biased, but they often have audio, video, photos, or scanned public records to back up the factual portion of the story. It's probably safe to believe that traffic light cycles have been shortened, people have been injured post-shortening (though perhaps not because of it), and the subject of the article has been attacking the automated ticketing hardware in protest. Aside from that, it's all about stirring up visibility and support for the guy.

Article suggests his effort have been kept out of the mainstream news out of corporate malice, but it's probably just because a single-person protest isn't very newsworthy until there is a hospitalization or an arrest.

I found this website after searching for the reports:

http://www.redlightscam.com/suffolk-county-red-light-cameras...

They seem to have the preserved the report mentioned in the article here:

http://nebula.wsimg.com/fcf2a132df15209b05e0822aab6046bf?Acc...

Go to page 13 of the report and it seems quite clear that they have increased.

Zero. Read the rest of the site. These are paranoid ramblings of mostly one individual. The fact that this is on the front page of hacker news really makes me worry about the critical thinking skills of the forum.

Actually, critical thinkers will separate ideas from their source.

While true, there still remains the question of how inaccurate this particular article is.

Would definitely like to know if more accidents are caused by reduced yellow light times. And whether local police support the guy.