News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IBM acquires Red Hat by p1necone on Sunday October 28, 2018 @09:58PM (#18324442)
This actually seems like fair policy to me, think of the mess Red Hat would be in if IBM decided that they had copyright on your contributions to Cygwin.

Or is my understanding of copyright law off base?

Re:IBM acquires Red Hat by LordDragonfang on Sunday October 28, 2018 @10:39PM (#18324611)
That's exactly why Red Hat had said permission slips. The ridiculous thing was that IBM refused to sign them
Re:IBM acquires Red Hat by mcv on Monday October 29, 2018 @04:16AM (#18325785)
The ridiculous thing is that IP law makes this necessary.
Re:IBM acquires Red Hat by qwerty456127 on Sunday October 28, 2018 @10:50PM (#18324676)
> if IBM decided that they had copyright on your contributions to Cygwin.

How could they decide this if you'd have written the code on a weekend?

Re:IBM acquires Red Hat by p1necone on Sunday October 28, 2018 @10:56PM (#18324709)
Many employers have clauses about owning any IP you produce while employed there, regardless of whether or not it involved company time or property. Whether said clauses are actually enforceable varies from location to location.
Re:IBM acquires Red Hat by XorNot on Monday October 29, 2018 @08:45AM (#18327008)
Aka "justice by bank balance and time".

At some point software engineering is going to have a union just as a legal defence fund.

Re:IBM acquires Red Hat by anticensor on Monday October 29, 2018 @11:20AM (#18328201)
Software engineers already have their own chambers of engineers in some states. No need for another trade organization.
Re:IBM acquires Red Hat by jmalicki on Sunday October 28, 2018 @11:36PM (#18324879)
The FSF doesn't want to get caught up in a dispute, and thus requires explicit disclaimers of work-for-hire interest from employers https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.en.html