News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by mikeash on Sunday October 28, 2018 @12:53PM (#18321494)
There’s nothing curious about concentrating on the problems that actually happen.
Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by _red on Sunday October 28, 2018 @01:13PM (#18321625)
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/18/texas-democ...

Rasmussen Poll shows 54% of Democrats support giving illegals right to vote. I don't know why you are going against what the majority of your party openly wants?

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by mikeash on Sunday October 28, 2018 @01:19PM (#18321663)
The activity cited in your link is not fraudulent. How many fraudulent votes were cast as a result?

What makes you think the Democrats are "my" party?

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by code_duck on Monday October 29, 2018 @12:30AM (#18325065)
“illegals” is a ridiculous and perjorative term. It’s not possible to be an illegal human being. Strange how people who supposedly abhor ‘big government’ and ‘over regulation’ give vast credence to government’s power to permit people to exist within an area or not.
Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by masonic on Monday October 29, 2018 @04:19AM (#18325799)

  It’s not possible to be an illegal human being
It's about humans doing illegal acts.
Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by code_duck on Monday October 29, 2018 @06:54AM (#18326400)
Right. So when a human commits an illegal act, such a a misdemeanor visa overstay, that doesn’t make the person ‘an illegal’ anymore than you become ‘an illegal’ because you habitually speed in your car.
Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by mikeash on Monday October 29, 2018 @10:38AM (#18327856)
Nitpick: unauthorized entry is a misdemeanor, but visa overstay is just a civil offense. This makes the comparison to speeding even more apt, of course.
Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by code_duck on Monday October 29, 2018 @12:33PM (#18328812)
Thank you.

I’m not a lawyer, but I’m positive be average person using the term “illegals” to refer to individuals of questionable immigration status understands less about the law than I and certainly less about morality.

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by tropo on Monday October 29, 2018 @11:48AM (#18328443)
The only fully correct term, as used in our laws and in numerous Supreme Court rulings, is "illegal alien". Shortening that to "aliens" causes confusion with legal aliens (people legitimately here with a valid visa, etc.) and of course with fictional creatures from space.

Without the power to permit people to exist within an area or not, one can not have any sort of social aid. Several billion people would show up to claim it.

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by dragonwriter on Monday October 29, 2018 @01:54PM (#18329534)
> The only fully correct term, as used in our laws and in numerous Supreme Court rulings, is "illegal alien".

Incorrect. While numerous Supreme Court decisions use “illegal alien” they do not do so exclusively, e.g., Plyler v. Doe (1981) uses, at a minimum, all of (directly, ignoring uses that occur only in quoted material, and consistently reflecting singular though some terms are used in both singular and plural, and some only plural, forms) “illegal alien”, “undocumented child”, “undocumented alien”, “undocumented resident alien”, and “illegal entrant”.

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by code_duck on Monday October 29, 2018 @12:32PM (#18328799)
I’d have to be sarcastic to say that was an interesting or useful perspective to which I had never been introduced.

I’ll leave this to other people to battle off HN. Best of luck informing yourself about how to not use perjorative terms to slander vast amounts of people.

As far as immigration control, I disagree with your scenario. Since my comment was about people who supposedly abhor regulation, i’d like to make sure to apply the same logic to pollution, financial fraud, lobbying and labor abuse.

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by mikeash on Monday October 29, 2018 @01:25PM (#18329249)
Shortening it to “illegals” is weird, though, since it could easily be the shorthand for illegal hunters, illegal employers, illegal polluters, or what have you.
Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by monocasa on Monday October 29, 2018 @01:39PM (#18329392)
Except being undocumented isn't actually a crime, so they're not committing an illegal act.
Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by tropo on Monday October 29, 2018 @03:23PM (#18330427)
I didn't say they were committing an illegal act, although most are. I just said that "illegal alien" is the only correct term under our law.

The vast majority are not undocumented. They have fraudulent documentation. Identity theft is not a victimless crime.

Overstaying a visa isn't a crime, but getting a visa with the intent to overstay it is a crime. Jumping the border is obviously a crime. Those two methods of entry cover the vast majority. There aren't a lot of people who intended to leave and then just... forgot the visa expiration date or something.

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by monocasa on Monday October 29, 2018 @05:06PM (#18331466)
> I just said that "illegal alien" is the only correct term under our law.

Except it isn't.

https://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2018/may/09/stev...

It appears in section headers that don't have legal weight behind them, and in reference to aliens who have additionally been convicted of at least on felony.

Just saying something doesn't make it true.

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by tropo on Monday October 29, 2018 @05:31PM (#18331707)
Not that politifact is trustworthy, but OK, which alternative do you like? That article lists "unauthorized aliens", "inadmissible aliens" and "deportable aliens". Undocumented is when somebody loses their wallet, so that won't do. These people generally have illegal documentation, possibly even matching your documentation.
Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by monocasa on Monday October 29, 2018 @06:04PM (#18331979)
Don't be so combative. You're the one spreading the falsehood that "The only fully correct term, as used in our laws and in numerous Supreme Court rulings, is "illegal alien"" despite having no real evidence of that.

> Undocumented is when somebody loses their wallet, so that won't do.

No, because someone without their wallet will still be documented in the databases.

> These people generally have illegal documentation, possibly even matching your documentation.

Do I need to track down how that's false too? You really seem to enjoy making statements with nothing to back them up.

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by code_duck on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @12:18PM (#18338237)
“Undocumented is when somebody loses their wallet, so that won't do.”

So, these terms have legal definitions. You may wish to inform yourself a lot better before having such debates.

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by code_duck on Monday October 29, 2018 @07:59PM (#18332795)
Coming to the US to pick crops is a victimless ‘crime’. If anyone, the bigger criminals are the US citizens who own the companies, large and small, who hire undocumented workers and know full well they are doing it.
Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by masonic on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @11:41PM (#18343167)
Less than one half of one percent are "picking crops".

Most work in hospitality and food prep, indoors.

Re:US election system reveals frightening vulnerabilities at... by code_duck on Thursday November 01, 2018 @07:36AM (#18352944)
Are you saying there is some qualitative difference there, or just adding work examples? Do you use the scare quotes to mean people who come to the US to work cleaning hotels are victimizing US citizens by doing so? Or that you disagree, because I’m wrong and people who prep sandwiches and clean apartments are more to blame for their unlawful employment than their employers?

Why would it matter that they're indoors? I’m really confused by what you choose to emphasize.

I find it unlikely that agricultural employees make up .5% of Central American immigrants in the US at any given time. That figure sounds low.