News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 produc... by reagank on Friday October 26, 2018 @03:29PM (#18312108)
There's no refuting of anything in the article. They actually CONFIRM that they've gotten document requests from DOJ, just voluntarily provided rather than after a subpoena. Watch your bias.
Re:Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 produc... by lajamerr on Friday October 26, 2018 @03:41PM (#18312189)
There's a big difference between handing over documents voluntarily to a government request and being forced to by subpoena though.

I'm curious on the exact wording the original article had.

Re:Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 produc... by gameswithgo on Friday October 26, 2018 @03:41PM (#18312193)
the original article said ex-employees had received subpoena, not tesla.
Re:Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 produc... by dang on Friday October 26, 2018 @03:44PM (#18312212)
The WSJ article is being discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18311492.
Re:Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 produc... by Freestyler_3 on Friday October 26, 2018 @03:40PM (#18312186)
Really opens your eyes to how careful a company(with shares) must be with anything said, if projections call for criminal probe.
Re:Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 produc... by anqoz on Friday October 26, 2018 @03:26PM (#18312090)
Journalists outright lying... This one is shocking, I've never seen it before...
Re:Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 produc... by gameswithgo on Friday October 26, 2018 @03:29PM (#18312105)
The WSJ article did not claim that Tesla received a subpoena.
Re:Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 produc... by happytoexplain on Friday October 26, 2018 @03:57PM (#18312283)
You're right, it is unusual. Journalists being falsely accused of lying, on the other hand, is depressingly common.