News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by munificent on Thursday October 25, 2018 @03:59PM (#18304076)
> What happens when you start at the same level but are promoted to different levels?

If through promotion or re-org one partner ends up in the subtree of the other, either end the relationship or find a new position for one of the two people.

> If you're responsible for making your company Billions of dollars a year the way Andy Rubin is you can easily argue he shouldn't be able to date anyone in that company at all without there being an unacceptable power dynamic.

So be it! Being in charge of thousands of people and billions of dollars is an incredible responsibility. That kind of responsibility requires discipline and sacrifice. If you want the freedom to fuck anyone you want in the org chart, don't try to climb to the top of the org chart.

> Google has literally millions of employees, is it ok to say he can't date any of them?

Thousands, not millions. And, yes, that's totally OK. Any executive who doesn't like that can spend some of the millions of dollars making themselves feel better. Seriously, if you're worth +$100M and you can't find a date outside of the office, you've got bigger problems than the org chart.

> You have to have a codified policy.

Google has a codified policy, which every employee signs that they agree to. It says you can't date people when there is a reporting chain between them.

There are seven billion people on Earth. Executives can find someone outside of their reporting structure to fall in love with. This isn't hard.

The only problem here is that the kind of people who want to be in charge of thousands of people and billions of dollars are often also the kind of people who want lots of power and to have the rules not apply to them.

Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by dcole2929 on Thursday October 25, 2018 @04:16PM (#18304213)
> Google has a codified policy

Google has a policy which they don't follow all the time because there are situations where they don't feel it properly addresses the situations to the satisfaction of all parties. That is a policy that doesn't work. I don't disagree with a lot of your points here. I'm just pointing out that people are trying to make what is a very complex issue sound simple. If it was simple the same problem wouldn't keep coming up.

> There are seven billion people on Earth. Executives can find someone outside of their reporting structure to fall in love with. This isn't hard.

And yet you don't control who you fall in love with. And everything we know tells us that you are far more likely to see 1-200 of those 7 billion people every day. And incredibly more likely to have things in common with and fall in love with someone in that much smaller group.

I think the problem here is that people are still people whether they are rich/successful or not. My policy is I don't date coworkers superior, inferior, or otherwise. But I think it's foolish to think that's a policy that everyone can and will adhere to. And that is really the only policy properly addresses all the issue with office romances.

Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by brown9-2 on Thursday October 25, 2018 @06:34PM (#18305193)
The policy doesn’t work for Google because they bend the rules for executives that they never would for rank-and-file employees.
Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by thereare5lights on Thursday October 25, 2018 @05:59PM (#18304951)
> And yet you don't control who you fall in love with.

Tough luck. If forcing people to choose between their job and their love is the price to pay to stop these sleezeballs, then so be it.