News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Icon search engine by cabalamat on Monday October 25, 2010 @09:53AM (#1829765)
Well, motion pictures are still called "films". And letters still have serifs on them, despite the original reason for it (easier to engrave in stone) no longer being valid.
Re:Icon search engine by wnoise on Monday October 25, 2010 @11:59AM (#1830303)
I'd really like a citation for serifs being easier to engrave in stone. That really doesn't make sense to me. I'd expect things like runes -- entirely straight lines, minimal decoration -- to be easier to carve.
Re:Icon search engine by jiaaro on Monday October 25, 2010 @01:58PM (#1830816)
when you're using a chisel on stone. you need to hit it straight down, creating a divet (the serif) to get the cut started.

If you put the chisel diagonal and hit it with a hammer right off the bat, it just slides across the stone, and you usually hurt your thumb ;)

Re:Icon search engine by wnoise on Tuesday October 26, 2010 @01:26PM (#1835124)
That doesn't seem all that implausible, but I'd expect the divot wouldn't need to be any wider than rest of the line.