In my estimation, most people are not wankers. I think we have different estimations.
And accomplishment is not a defense against wankerdom.
It makes any kind of discussion impossible.
Look at the person you relied to, his post is already grey.
The guy is kind of a wanker:
https://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/a5380/millionaire-start...
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/29/elon-musk...
Everyone just give him a free pass which is bullshit.
Personally I think the guy is a narcissist given how much he loves attention. Like most narcissists he will shit on you if you get in his way, right and wrong be damned - something to keep in mind.
So all we are suppose to do is sing his praises on this site?
On this site, please neither sing praises nor vent ragefully. Both are boring.
But I find it amusing that people are so quick to point out his faults and criticize the guy when he's accomplished more in his life to date than any single one of his critics, with at most a couple exceptions, like Bezos.
Basically if he's a wanker, what's that make you? I don't think it's fallacious reasoning here at all to say that. Basically your standards for a non-wanker must be so high as to include almost nobody. I'm not just talking about his financial success, I'm talking about changing the world for the better with his companies, for raising 5 children, etc. The guy has his faults, but so do we all. If he's a wanker, than really who isn't?